In my research paper, the stakeholders are: the adolescents, 'peers', adults/guardians/parents, the media portrayals i.e.. actors, singer/songwriters, models, ect..., school teachers, and also the scientists conducting the experiments on the adolescents.
The adolescents and peers are a stakeholder because they are the main point in my paper. The adolescents are the ones making the decisions and the peers are the friends or sociable group that could be involved or else not involved in what the adolescents do. peers as in whole and could also include the adolescent. The adults/guardians are the ones that should be censoring what their child is viewing or listening to. They may not always have the availability to keep constant eye on their child however the parents should have an idea to prevent unwanted viewing. The media portrayals are the people that create or display provocative things or say certain things that may act on an adolescents mind. The school teachers are another example of adolescents guardians. The scientist are the ones who control what they are searching for in their experiments. Holding the stakes on what and what not to research into.
I also think the audience has a great hold in stakes. If the audience does not have the questions asked and answered in the way that they want, the audience will loose interest. I need to address every stakeholder with a question that can be narrowed down and answer fully, considering all sides or possibilities.
Yes, I agree. Think more broadly, now, about why we should care about this issue, especially if we're not members of any of these groups. For instance, why should _I_ care about this? Why should your parents? What about the general public? How will this project matter to them?
ReplyDelete